Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-09-05-Speech-2-246"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-09-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Commission Question Time2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060905.25.2-246"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-09-05-Speech-2-2472
lpv:speaker	lp:Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; LIBE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; Temporary Committee on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transport and illegal detention of prisoners (2006-01-19--2007-02-14)3 unknown; Partei des Demokratischen Sozialismus (2004-07-20--2006-10-04)3 vice-president; European Parliament (2004-07-20--2007-01-15)3 member; AFCO (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with Japan (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 vice-president; Parliament's Bureau (2004-07-20--2007-01-15)3 member; EUL/NGL (2004-07-20--2009-05-13)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Korean Peninsula (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Question No 41 by Karl-Heinz Florenz () In its resolution on the European Environment [amp] Health Action Plan 2004-2010 of 23 February 2006, Parliament encouraged the Commission to designate environmental tobacco smoke a class 1 carcinogen as soon as possible. However, no mention was made of this measure during the informal consultation on smoke-free policies at EU level (closing date: 14 June) organised by the Directorate-General for Health and Consumer Protection. Has the Commission taken any steps to classify passive smoking as carcinogenic to humans? If not, why not? Does the Commission intend to follow the recommendation of the ASPECT report and classify passive tobacco smoke as a carcinogenic agent? If not, why not?"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"President."1 "Subject: Classification of passive tobacco smoke as a human carcinogen"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph