Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-09-05-Speech-2-132"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-09-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060905.19.2-132"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-09-05-Speech-2-1332
lpv:speaker	lp:Hélène Goudin2
lpv:spokenAs	member; IND/DEM (2004-07-20--2007-06-12)3 substitute; ENVI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Junilistan (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; DEVE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 vice-chair; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Naturally, the June List wants to play its part in the fight against violence against women, but this report would mean that the EU would have a legal basis from which to interfere in the Member States’ most sensitive areas, namely legislation and preventative measures against violence. The current Member States do not share a common point of view in these areas, while their legal cultures also differ. What is more, this report has been drawn up in a vague way. Parliament’s proposals contain too many unclear terms whilst at the same time explaining to the Member States how they are to conduct the fight against violence and the oppression of women. A clear example of this is Amendment 14, which would tacitly recognise that certain male groups are more inclined to violent behaviour towards their women than other, prosperous men of different ethnicity. This claim is not backed up either by statistics or references to scientific studies. Parliament’s proposals also fail to take account of the cultural and legal problems that they would cause the Member States. The June List has thus voted against the report."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph