Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-07-05-Speech-3-252"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-07-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Council Question Time2
dcterms:Language	"fi"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060705.19.3-252"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-07-05-Speech-3-2532
lpv:speaker	lp:Eija-Riitta Korhola2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 member; ENVI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; AFET (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Kansallinen Kokoomus (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; CONT (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3 member; DROI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; EPP-ED (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"President-in-Office of the Council, I appreciate your well-informed reply to the previous question enormously. I would like to continue with the subject because the Council is now represented by a Presidency which has a lot of practical experience of its own of the negative aspects of emissions trading, a key instrument selected by the EU to prepare for the Kyoto Protocol. These negative experiences include distortion of competition, disruptions in the internal market, and the fact that any party that has dealt well with the problem and taken environmental action early can end up paying for it. That is why, whereas the Commission still plugs emissions trading as a success story, Finland should have the opportunity to put this concept into a more realistic framework. Does Finland mean to do that, and what sort of improvements would you be prepared to propose to correct the problems of emissions trading?"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph