Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-07-04-Speech-2-059"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-07-04"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:ERDF, ESF, Cohesion Fund (general provisions) – Establishment of a Cohesion Fund – European Social Fund – European Regional Development Fund – European grouping of territorial cooperation (EGTC) (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"sk"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060704.5.2-059"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-07-04-Speech-2-0602
lpv:speaker	lp:Peter Baco2
lpv:spokenAs	member; NA (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Croatia Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 substitute; REGI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; AGRI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Hnutie za demokratické Slovensko (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Ladies and gentlemen, today we are debating and tomorrow we will be asked to approve the well-drafted reports on structural funds for the 2007–2013 period. In this context and as a citizen of Slovakia, a new Member State in the European Union, I realise the great importance of structural assistance given by the economically strong Member States to the new members. We truly appreciate this assistance to the Slovak Republic: we are grateful for it and feel beholden. In particular, I am pleased by the fact that the agreement between the European Parliament and Council supports the measures proposed by new Member States, also known as the N+3 rules, which address issues such as VAT and housing. This is a good and long overdue solution, as evidenced by the fact that all MEPs from the new Member States voted for these proposals during the first reading in this House. For this reason, the Greens’ report on the general provisions of the Cohesion Fund seems to be a document we would be better off without, and I do not recommend approving it."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph