Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-06-15-Speech-4-157"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20060615.24.4-157"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
We regret the fact that, even though they had the backing of 200 Members, some of the proposals that we tabled were rejected, which were as follows:
to encourage fishermen to take part in the trading process and to promote a review of the COM in fisheries products so as to ensure fairer initial sales prices and to promote a better distribution of added value.
to ensure the participation of inshore fishermen and their representative organisations in the decision-making process of the common fisheries policy, the protection of the marine environment and the recovery of fish stocks, promoting the application of the co-management principle and decentralisation of the CFP.
to set up a Community programme for traditional, small-scale inshore fishing;
to establish emergency transitional compensation to offset the effects of the increase in the price of fuel.
Other proposals, however, were adopted and included in the original report, as confirmed today. Of these I should like to highlight:
to recognise the specific nature of inshore and traditional fishing in the CFP, and to determine how far the existing instruments are suitable for responding to the sector's needs;
the new EFP must continue the financing of fleet renewal measures for inshore
fisheries;
to set up education and training programmes aimed at encouraging young people to enter the sector;
the funding of projects and activities by representative organisations in the sector and local authorities;"@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples