Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-06-14-Speech-3-077"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20060614.2.3-077"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
"The future of Europe is a very important matter. It is not true that a good European must be a federalist. We can be good Europeans without being enthusiastic about the Constitutional Treaty. Should the period of reflection be extended? It certainly should, although we ought to make sure that this period is really used for reflection rather than for pleas, wishful thinking or creating the false impression that there is no alternative to the Treaty. An extended period of reflection should be used to consider what Europeans really want, how a balance can be achieved between the large and the small Member States, between the new and old Member States, between richer and poorer regions, between the desire to be competitive and the dogma of the European social model. This is not an easy task. I am concerned that we will not be able to resolve these issues if we limit our reflections to the existing text of the Constitutional Treaty. It is also important to be honest with Europeans. Are we sure they will accept European Union enlargement achieved at the cost of strengthening the political dominance of the largest states of the European Union? Did all current EU Member States take part in drawing up the Constitutional Treaty on equal terms? A lot has been said about Europe needing to be closer to its citizens, that it should be easier for them to understand. I hope that this wish also applies to the debate on the European Constitution."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph