Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-06-13-Speech-2-264"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-06-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060613.27.2-264"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-06-13-Speech-2-2652
lpv:speaker	lp:Bart Staes2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation to the EU-Kazakhstan, EU-Kyrgyzstan and EU-Uzbekistan Parliamentary Cooperation Committees, and for relations with Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Mongolia (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Groen (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; CONT (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; G/EFA (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; ENVI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Commissioner, thank you for your response which is, indeed, somewhat disappointing, especially because it contradicts Mr Adamou's report, which we discussed today, and Article 23 of which specifically asks for a task force such as this, or an influenza working party. You claim that this will not add any value, but all scientists I have spoken to during preparations of the Adamou report claim that there is indeed a great deal of expertise, but that it is very widespread and that an influenza working party would certainly add value and would even be more effective than the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), which is currently carrying out some of the tasks. Could you, then, explain once more why this working party would not add any value?"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph