Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-04-27-Speech-4-192"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20060427.48.4-192"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
The report before us forms part of the neoliberal agenda of the Lisbon Strategy. It proposes that State aid be considered an exception and calls for more measures to deregulate, to ensure competition, to facilitate access to capital, to encourage entrepreneurial spirit, to remove barriers to the movement of both workers and researchers. It also calls for a common immigration policy to suit these ends, not least in the area of recruitment in the information and communications technology (ICT) sector. At the same time it encourages private-public partnerships and deems aid for SMEs ineffective. All of which in the name of innovation!
On the other hand, it promotes a strategy of horizontal objectives for State aid defined at Community level, especially, once again in the name of so-called innovation. The purpose of this process, which also forms part of the Bologna education process, is for universities and schools to meet the basic needs of the large multinationals, ‘educating’ a homogenous workforce with linguistic skills in ICT and in languages that facilitate the professional and geographical mobility and the adaptability of work, whilst at the same time commercialising knowledge and the fruits of research. We therefore voted against."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples