Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-04-27-Speech-4-073"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-04-27"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:A stronger partnership between the European Union and Latin America (vote)2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060427.17.4-073"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-04-27-Speech-4-0772
lpv:speaker	lp:José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-neyra2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Partido Popular (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; AFET (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; Temporary Committee on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transport and illegal detention of prisoners (2006-01-19--2007-02-14)3 substitute; SEDE (2004-07-27--2007-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-29--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America (2004-10-12--2007-03-13)3 substitute; AFCO (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3 vice-chair; Delegation for relations with Mercosur (2004-09-21--2007-03-13)3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (2004-08-31--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of the Andean Community (2004-09-29--2007-03-13)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the NATO Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-16--2007-03-13)3
lpv:translated text	". Mr President, I simply wished to say that, during yesterday’s debate on the report, certain political group representatives proposed that the expression ‘free-trade area by 2010’ be replaced with ‘area of global interregional partnership in the medium term’ in paragraphs 6, 21 and 66. This proposal has also been taken up in the form of an oral amendment that Mr Lipietz wishes to table. Mr President, if the House has no objection, I do not have any objection to accepting this proposal either, and I therefore believe that the requests for split votes from certain groups, such as the Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance and the Confederal Group of the European United Left/Nordic Green Left, do not make any sense if the House accepts this wording, with which I agree. I would like to mention a final point, Mr President, which is a technical adjustment. In paragraph 77, the Committee on Foreign Affairs approved an amendment from Mr Fatuzzo relating to pensions. My only proposal is to take the section of Mr Fatuzzo’s amendment that I am going to read and move it to paragraph 35, which is a more appropriate place for it. We would therefore add the following to the end of paragraph 35: ‘which allows for more efficient social security systems offering secure and higher pensions’. I would therefore change the expression ‘Euro-Latin American free trade area by 2010’ to ‘area of global interregional partnership in the medium term’ in paragraphs 6, 21 and 66 and move the end of Mr Fatuzzo’s amendment to paragraph 35."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph