Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-04-26-Speech-3-175"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20060426.15.3-175"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
"Mr President, I should also like to begin by endorsing what Mr Stubb said. It is scandalous that we should be debating such an important matter as the discharge procedure at such a late hour after having had one-minute speeches on subjects such as whether Mr Prodi was a KGB agent. I have to say – with a touch of black humour that nonetheless contains a grain of truth – that, on this particular occasion, it is perhaps just as well that people outside our building are not interested in what we are doing, as we should be a laughing stock, I believe, if anyone could actually see to what we were giving priority on the agenda in preference to this extremely important matter. I wish to thank Mr Mulder, who has done an outstanding job on his report. I think that the whole process has been helpful and constructive. Only in that way is it possible to achieve as impressive a result as he has achieved, and one that will obtain a large majority in Parliament. The discharge procedure is an extremely important one. I also wish to endorse his recommendation that we naturally grant the Commission discharge. Obviously, it must be accompanied by a number of observations because, this year too, the basic issue of our dissatisfaction arises. Unfortunately, not enough has been done. There are unfortunately too many areas in which we still cannot give satisfactory assurances that European taxpayers’ money is being properly administered. That being said, there are nonetheless grounds for optimism. There are a number of areas in which progress is being made. Take, for example, the Integrated Administrative Control System within the agricultural sphere, in which a procedure has been set in motion that has in actual fact proved to be effective and that, into the bargain, has for the first time caused the Court of Auditors to write directly in its report that there has been significant progress in this area. Praise is obviously in order. There is also reason for pointing out in this connection that, under this procedure and specifically with regard to our demand for an annual statement of assurance from the individual Member States, an agreement along the lines we wanted has, in relation to the financial perspective, now been reached between the various institutions. That is something else about which we should, of course, be pleased. Finally, I want to say a few words about what has been closest to my own heart in this process, namely compliance with our demand for more transparency and openness. What is at issue here are the Commission’s working parties and the many committees that come under the umbrella of the Commission. We are concerned too with the individual countries in relation to the money paid out. On this point, I am very pleased with the assurances I see the Commissioners as having given today."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph