Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-03-22-Speech-3-107"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-03-22"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Security of energy supply in the European Union (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"lt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060322.12.3-107"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-03-22-Speech-3-1082
lpv:speaker	lp:Šarūnas Birutis2
lpv:spokenAs	member; ITRE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3,3 member; ALDE (2004-07-20--2007-02-26)3,3 unknown; Darbo partija (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia and the South Asia Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3,3 substitute; IMCO (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3,3 member; Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3,3
lpv:translated text	"This resolution is a very important and timely document, expressing the European Parliament's position on the changing situation in the European Union energy sector. The resolution marks the beginning of the debate on the Green Paper for a safe, competitive and harmonious energy policy. Alongside energy consumption efficiency, the variety of energy sources mentioned in the resolution is the fundamental factor in reducing European Union states' dependence on the supply of energy resources from third countries. Significant attention is paid to the area of nuclear energy, as nuclear energy is an inseparable part of the European Union energy sector. It is very important for Lithuania and other states, which have insufficient wind, solar and geothermal power or other alternatives to gases and oils. It is right that initiative to develop nuclear energy should remain the prerogative of Member States. Legislation must be laid down so that part of the funding allocated to agricultural policy is available for biomass growth, production and energy needs. The principle of energy solidarity between Member States is extremely important. It is important in talks with the wider world. When planning energy sector projects, Member States should assess the consequences these will have on other countries. Therefore, I believe we should focus on revising the annexes of the TEN-E. The project list contains conflicting views of what I would call the political Northern Pipeline in the Baltic Sea. Unfortunately, it fails to mention any of the projects which are important for the Baltic countries and Poland, such as the ‘Amber’ pipeline or electricity connections, allowing the isolated Baltic region to be quickly switched into the European area."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph