Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-03-16-Speech-4-150"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-03-16"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060316.17.4-150"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-03-16-Speech-4-1512
lpv:speaker	lp:Luís Queiró2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with Mercosur (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3,3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (2004-11-14--2009-07-13)3,3 member; SEDE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3,3 substitute; AFET (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3,3 unknown; Coligaçao Força Portugal (PPD/PSD.CDS-PP) (2004-07-20--2007-11-22)3,3 vice-chair; TRAN (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3,3
lpv:translated text	". In the context of the vote on the joint resolution on the 62nd session of the United Nations Human Rights Commission (UNHRC, Geneva), I wish to mention what I consider to be a possible solution, albeit not an ideal one, as regards one of the most significant points raised in the debate. One of the UN's biggest shortcomings on human rights has always been the lack of legitimacy of some of its Human Rights Commission members, especially when they have chaired it. The list has been well-documented and I do not feel the need to repeat it here. The outcome, namely the method of electing the members of the future Human Rights Council, does not guarantee that this will not happen again, but at least represents an attempt effectively to legitimise its members, and this should be acknowledged. I also feel that this is an opportunity to reinforce the idea that EU Member States and their allies should try to set an example on human rights, in their own countries or in their international relations."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph