Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-03-16-Speech-4-146"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20060316.17.4-146"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
".
Today, Parliament has given its opinion on the strategy for managing future enlargements of the European Union.
Enlargement ‘reunions’ with our brothers in Europe – Bulgarians, Romanians, Croats, Macedonians and others, arbitrarily separated from us after Yalta. They are as destined to join us as the European Union is to integrate them. It is not the substance that I am contesting, but the form and the timescale, and that is the reason why I voted for paragraphs 5 and 6.
It is time for the European Union to enter into a proper debate about its own borders. This is something it carefully avoided doing throughout all the work of the Convention. It is a black hole in the Constitution that has amply fuelled scepticism and anxiety. Avoiding unpleasantness is an attitude unworthy of us and of our electors, and asking for a debate does not make us ‘refuseniks’ against enlargement.
A Europe without borders is of no use to those who want a European power.
Our borders may be geographical, historical and moral, of course, but they are necessary to preserve a model, a vision and common values."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples