Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-03-14-Speech-2-321"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-03-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Commission Question Time2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060314.27.2-321"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-03-14-Speech-2-3222
lpv:speaker	lp:Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; LIBE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; Temporary Committee on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transport and illegal detention of prisoners (2006-01-19--2007-02-14)3 unknown; Partei des Demokratischen Sozialismus (2004-07-20--2006-10-04)3 vice-president; European Parliament (2004-07-20--2007-01-15)3 member; AFCO (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with Japan (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 vice-president; Parliament's Bureau (2004-07-20--2007-01-15)3 member; EUL/NGL (2004-07-20--2009-05-13)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Korean Peninsula (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3
lpv:translated text	"What alternatives has the Commission considered to the enforced transfer of sections, and how would they be put into practice, or is it relying on the experience the Secretary-General and Board of Governors have had with such removals, which, because of the way in which they were carried out when the Ixelles school was opened, brought about an intolerable state of affairs? Is the Commission prepared to disclose, and explain, the voting instructions given to its representative on the Board of Governors? Question No 50 by Enrico Letta () The Board of Governors of the European Schools has established the criteria to be used in deciding which language sections will be opened in the fourth Brussels European School in Laeken. The working party ( ) chaired by the Secretary General of the Board of Governors has indicated in a number of official documents that the Italian section from the Brussels II school will be one of those proposed to the Council for transfer to the fourth school. No doubt this conclusion is the result of a comparative analysis that matched the criteria with the various language sections. Can the Commission give the details of this analysis? If such an analysis was not carried out, can the Commission explain how this outcome was arrived at and, in particular, describe how the other language sections came to be excluded? We are of course aware that at this stage no final decision has been taken, but it would nevertheless be useful to know in detail the procedure followed so far by the working party in order to ascertain whether it has been subject to sufficiently rigorous scientific criteria to justify proposals which could have extremely damaging effects on the families of hundreds of officials from the Community institutions. Question No 51 by Richard Seeber () The Board of Governors of the European Schools is in the process of deciding on the language sections to be set up in the Brussels IV school at Laeken. One of the options submitted to the Board of Governors is to transfer the Woluwé Italian- and Dutch-language sections and the Ixelles German-language section to Laeken. Does the Commission realise that children from the Woluwé and Ixelles catchment areas will be sitting in school buses for a total of between three and four hours a day if they are transferred to Laeken?"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"President."1 "Subject: Brussels II European School transfer of sections"1 "Subject: Transfer of the German-language section"1 "groupe de suivi"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph