Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-02-16-Speech-4-076"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-02-16"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"sk"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060216.15.4-076"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-02-16-Speech-4-0772
lpv:speaker	lp:Zita Pleštinská2
lpv:spokenAs	member; IMCO (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3,3 substitute; TRAN (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3,3 substitute; FEMM (2005-09-21--2007-01-14)3,3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3,3 member; EPP-ED (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3 member; Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3,3 unknown; Slovenská demokratická a kresťanská únia (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3
lpv:translated text	"The reason why I abstained during the voting on the Evelyn Gebhardt report on the Services Directive was that Amendment 250, presented by MEPs from the new Member States in the PPE-DE Group and considered to be a key point for new member countries, had not been adopted. This amendment was to change the Directive by adding Article 35a as a replacement for Articles 24 and 25 on the posting of workers, which were removed from the Commission’s proposal during voting in the IMCO committee. The amendment would have simplified the procedures for posting workers, as the Posting of Workers Directive does not provide for any administrative cooperation between the country of origin and the country of destination. I am pleased that the Directive was approved during the first reading in the European Parliament. But on the other hand, I am saddened that MEPs from the new member countries again failed to gain enough support."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph