Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2006-02-01-Speech-3-041"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2006-02-01"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Common foreign policy perspectives for 2006 – Common foreign and security policy – 20042
dcterms:Language	"lv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20060201.11.3-041"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2006-02-01-Speech-3-0422
lpv:speaker	lp:Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; AFET (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Japan (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 substitute; Temporary Committee on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transport and illegal detention of prisoners (2006-01-19--2007-02-14)3 vice-chair; SEDE (2004-09-01--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Tēvzemei un Brīvībai/LNNK (2004-07-20--2008-05-28)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (including Libya) (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 member; UEN (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; DEVE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Mrs Ferrero-Waldner, Mr Solana, ladies and gentlemen, today’s debate concerns the need for a more open, more effective and more responsible European Union common foreign and security policy. We can be satisfied that, in recent years, much positive work has been achieved in the advancement of Europe’s civil military force. Unfortunately, however, the report by Mr Brok shows up too many still unresolved deficiencies and problems with the CFSP. There are serious difficulties inherent in adopting decisive positions regarding Europe’s Common Security and Defence Policy (ECSDP) and the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP). These policies suffer from a serious lack of resources, and emphasis is also placed on the need for democratic parliamentary control. These are only a few of the current issues relevant to the subject of today’s debate. So we, the European Parliament, ought to be able to change things for the better, and this includes demanding appropriate policy coordination in order to ensure intensive dialogue between the European Parliament and the Council on these issues. We know that this is not easy, but it is a question of the European Parliament’s institutional influence and development. The clear backing from Europe’s citizens for joint European security actions imposes a duty on the European Parliament to expand its institutional influence and participation in decision-making. Security will only increase if the messages from Mr Chirac, Mr Solana or Mrs Merkel or decisions taken in the spheres of weapons of mass destruction, combating terrorism or energy are predictable, and do not take an unprepared European Parliament unawares."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph