Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-12-15-Speech-4-250"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20051215.29.4-250"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:translated text |
"Regarding letter of amendment No 1, the Danish Liberal Party does not believe that the destruction of foodstuffs is appropriate. However, the problem is aid for production, not aid for destruction. The amendment concerns the effects of the problem, but does not tackle its cause.
Regarding letter of amendment No 2, the Danish Liberal Party wishes to solve the problems of famine in developing countries, but believes that doing so requires a far more serious and coordinated effort than that indicated in this proposal.
Regarding letter of amendment No 3, the Danish Liberal Party is opposed to aid for the export of live animals, but the amendment will not solve this problem. The wording is also fairly unclear.
Regarding letter of amendment No 6, the Danish Liberal Party supports reform of the reimbursement of travel expenses, so that all reasonable and necessary travel expenses are refunded. Such reform has, however, already been decided on with the new Statute for Members. Moreover, the amendment could not be implemented in practice.
Overall, Mr Bonde’s amendments have to be characterised as ill thought-out."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples