Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-11-30-Speech-3-117"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-11-30"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:One-minute speeches on matters of political importance2
dcterms:Language	"lt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20051130.13.3-117"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-11-30-Speech-3-1182
lpv:speaker	lp:Laima Liucija Andrikienė2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; AFET (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Tėvynės sąjunga (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 member; BUDG (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; EPP-ED (2004-07-20--2007-10-08)3 member; DROI (2004-09-16--2007-01-14)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"October 27–28 marked the renewal of negotiations on the Trans-Dniester region, which are now being carried out under the ‘five plus two’ principle: Russia, Ukraine, the OSCE, Moldova and the Trans-Dniester region, the five previous participants in the negotiations, were joined by the USA and the European Union, both taking part as observers. Moldova has more than once declared its intentions for European integration, but the most acute obstacle the country is facing is the Trans-Dniester issue. Admittedly, one cannot expect immediate important results right at the beginning of the renewed negotiations. However, I would like to point out that the biggest concern lies in the fact that the USA and the European Union have signed a document treating the two parts of Moldova as equal parties to the conflict, with Russia being an intermediary. I am convinced that the EU has failed to take a well-considered position in this particular case. Its position is flawed because the Trans-Dniester issue amounts to a conflict between Russia and Moldova, i.e. Russia should not be considered as an intermediary."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph