Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-11-15-Speech-2-046"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-11-15"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Legislative and work programme for 20062
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20051115.7.2-046"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-11-15-Speech-2-0472
lpv:speaker	lp:Ingeborg Grässle2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with the countries of the Andean Community (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 member; BUDG (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; CULT (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3 member; CONT (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2009-01-15)3 member; EPP-ED (2004-07-20--2007-02-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, Mr President of the Commission, Commissioners, ladies and gentlemen, with 96 priority projects, 32 of which are legislative in character, this Europe of ours cannot be accused of not making plans, so respect to it, especially when one bears in mind the fact that the list does not even include the legislative programming that actually should be a priority for 2006, in the shape of some 50 legal bases for the multiannual programmes for the 2007-2013 period. Basically, then, the package we are discussing today gives little outward indication of its true contents, and what has become of subsidiarity or of the test for it? The Council, which today is conspicuous by its absence, has, once again, embarrassingly failed to take part in this planning work, let alone set priorities for it. The two presidencies for next year, Austria and Finland, have even, in a letter dated 19 October, gone so far as to announce their own work programme for 2006, so that is something for us to look forward to, as also to seeing how all these things can be brought together. It was the Council that could, by means of and in the course of this consultation procedure, have given a fine indication of its commitment to subsidiarity by involving the national parliaments in the manner provided for by the Constitution. It could have left its mark on this procedure, by approaching Parliament and the Commission, instead of leaving us all in the dark about what is meant to happen next and what proposals the Council itself is going to make. Parliament has set up a reserve for posts in the Commission, which will be paid out only if the work programme is agreed to. It would be a good thing if this work programme really were to include all the projects that we know even now to be on the agenda for 2006, and if it paid greater heed to the idea of subsidiarity as regards procedures and substance."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph