Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-10-24-Speech-1-019"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-10-24"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Order of business2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20051024.12.1-019"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-10-24-Speech-1-0202
lpv:speaker	lp:Martin Schulz2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Conference of Presidents (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; LIBE (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3,3 member; DROI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3,3 unknown; Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3 chair; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, it is indeed the case that our group had made a request to the Conference of Presidents that the debate on the Commission statement on patents for biotechnological inventions should go ahead, but that there should be no resolution. If we include today in the reckoning, there will be 48 hours between the debate and the adoption, and we do not believe that it is possible, in so short a time, to hammer out a common position on one of the most important and controversial issues in European political debate. I do not think we can be seriously expected to do that. We do believe that it makes sense to debate this now, but, when dealing with an area as problematic as this one, Parliament should be allowed more time to make a statement. We therefore ask that the debate should be allowed to go ahead, but without motions for resolutions being tabled, and that the order of business be amended accordingly. Debate without resolution!"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph