Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-09-27-Speech-2-185"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20050927.19.2-185"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"Madam President, Commissioner, we agree with better law-making. Clearly, we would like there to be less pernickety bureaucracy and we would like to give business a bit of air.
However, what is your vision for cooperation with the European Parliament, which is a co-legislator? Even though it is not provided for in the Treaty, in view of the interinstitutional agreement, how do you see the participation of our parliamentary committees? With regard to the impact assessment, which we called for, it must not turn into automatic justification for the Commission’s proposal or into justification for doing nothing. What will happen, also, to the impact assessment on the amendments proposed by the European Parliament?
Finally, with regard to simplification, which is very important, we must take care that it does not lead to deregulation. Meddling with the Community acquis in the field of social affairs, the environment or consumer protection could lead to social dumping. We will therefore be very vigilant. Better law-making does not have to mean fewer laws. What place is given to standardisation? The European Parliament draws its legitimacy from codecision. We must not reduce its legislative power."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples