Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-09-07-Speech-3-254"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-09-07"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Council Question Time2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050907.20.3-254"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-09-07-Speech-3-2552
lpv:speaker	lp:Michl Ebner2
lpv:spokenAs	member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (2004-11-14--2009-07-13)3 substitute; AFET (2004-09-15--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Südtiroler Volkspartei (2004-09-20--2009-07-13)3 member; AGRI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Croatia Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, in this House’s Rules of Procedure, Rule 166(2) states that ‘a request to raise a point of order shall take precedence over all other requests to speak’. My request to speak is therefore perfectly justified. I should like to make a request to speak regarding Rule 109 ‘Question Time’, paragraph 4 of which makes reference to Annex II. Point 4 under ‘Supplementary questions’ in Annex II reads as follows: ‘Each Member may follow up the reply with a supplementary question to any question. He may put in all two supplementary questions.’ I have the Italian version, too, which says the same. If the official who has been constantly gesturing to me that I am not entitled to put a second supplementary question has this point checked by the competent authorities, he will find that I am indeed entitled to do so under the current Rules of Procedure, subject to your consent pursuant to point 6(a) of Annex II."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph