Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-09-07-Speech-3-105"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-09-07"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050907.15.3-105"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-09-07-Speech-3-1062
lpv:speaker	lp:Robert Goebbels2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Parti ouvrier socialiste luxembourgeois (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; CONT (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia and the South Asia Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 member; ECON (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 substitute; INTA (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 vice-chair; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	". I am a firm supporter of social Europe and of the protection of employees from hazards at work. The road to hell is paved with good intentions, however. The European Union and Parliament in particular have a natural tendency towards over-regulation. That is the case with the directive providing for protection not only against artificial radiation, but also against natural radiation. Since the dawn of time, humankind has been able to adapt to the natural climate. The desert Bedouins dress differently to people from the North. Why should we want to churn out regulations governing workers’ exposure to sunlight from Sicily to the Arctic Circle? Would it not be sufficient to apply what is today pompously referred to as the precautionary principle, namely basic caution, instead of legislating left, right and centre?"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph