Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-09-06-Speech-2-120"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-09-06"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050906.27.2-120"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-09-06-Speech-2-1212
lpv:speaker	lp:Christa Klass2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; AGRI (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 member; ENVI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; EPP-ED (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; FEMM (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3 vice-chair; Delegation to the EU-Chile Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-21--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	". My concern is with the manufacture of gelatine and bio-gelatine. Both types of gelatine are manufactured using the same production process. The only difference is in the collection and monitoring of the raw materials, those for the manufacture of bio-gelatine being derived only from pigs reared under monitored ecological conditions, with all the regulations applicable to ecological rearing observed and complied with. Annex 6, part C of this Regulation includes a derogation for raw materials for the production of conventional gelatine, as non-organically produced agricultural products may, up to a certain percentage, be included in the manufacture of organic products. That is only right, since the current demand for gelatine still far exceeds the supply of bio-gelatine. There are, in Germany, many businesses engaged in the manufacture of bio-gelatine. In order that the production of such bio-gelatine may continue to be permissible, Annex 6, part B of the Regulation must include the following processing aids:"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph