Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-07-04-Speech-1-021"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-07-04"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Order of business2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050704.13.1-021"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-07-04-Speech-1-0222
lpv:speaker	lp:Pervenche Berès2
lpv:spokenAs	member; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Parti socialiste (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 chair; ECON (2004-09-01--2007-01-14)3 member; Conference of Committee Chairs (2004-09-01--2007-01-15)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 substitute; AFCO (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	". Mr President, allow me to reassure you and to reassure Mr Maaten: I feel very much part of the Socialist Group in the European Parliament, and, therefore, it is not on behalf of the Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe that I will speak, but as the Chairman of the committee concerned with the two reports in question. Basically, the request that we are going to examine to change the agenda is slightly paradoxical, because the entire strategy carried out by the rapporteurs and the Commission was aimed at having a joint debate on those two texts: the policy of the Central Bank and the information and communication strategy regarding the euro. The agenda as it is envisaged, with the one report following the other, very much reflects this intention. There is, however, something strange in all of this: how did the idea of holding two separate debates instead of one joint debate come about in our agenda? I hope that the plenary vote will allow things to be returned to normal as good sense would dictate."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph