Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-06-08-Speech-3-120"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20050608.13.3-120"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"I am abstaining from voting on this report for the following reasons.
I am in favour of a stronger, more political Europe. It is difficult for the European Parliament to put forward a figure for the general budget that is below that proposed by the Commission. It is difficult to want more Europe without an adequate budget. I feel it necessary, therefore, to give some pointers to the Heads of State or Government who will make the final decision on the level of the financial perspective. They must give to Europe the means of achieving its goals
Joint financing of the first pillar of the common agricultural policy (CAP) must be rejected. It introduces ideas that could prove destructive to one of the founding policies of the European Union and moves it towards renationalisation. It does nothing at all for the European credit deficit. Instead it transfers responsibility for part of the cost onto the Member States and/or their territorial communities without ensuring that they actually have the means to pay. It is a false solution for those who refuse to take decisions in favour of a better distribution of public support for agriculture and for a more in-depth review of the CAP that would lead to more sustainable agriculture."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples