Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-05-25-Speech-3-063"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-05-25"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Framework agreement on EP–Commission relations2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050525.12.3-063"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-05-25-Speech-3-0642
lpv:speaker	lp:Pervenche Berès2
lpv:spokenAs	member; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Parti socialiste (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 chair; ECON (2004-09-01--2007-01-14)3 member; Conference of Committee Chairs (2004-09-01--2007-01-15)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 substitute; AFCO (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	". Mr President, ten months after the Commission entered office, we must be pleased by this result, even though I would imagine, Commissioner, that from the point of view of the method, being yourself so to speak the champion for transparency within the Commission, you must not be fully satisfied with the conditions under which this agreement was negotiated and you must think that there are further improvements to be made next time. With regard to the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, this agreement concerns us in three respects. First of all, conflicts of interest: we are waiting for it to be fully implemented with, I hope, complete transparency. Then there is comitology and, on this matter, I thank you for your comments. In the view of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, implementation of the Lamfalussy process is acceptable only if it operates in accordance with the interinstitutional agreement that we drew up during the previous Parliamentary term, which makes it possible to take full account of the position of the European Parliament to the same extent as the deliberations of the Council. My final point relates to the implementation of the new Lisbon Strategy and the way in which this Parliament is involved in the adoption of ‘employment’ guidelines and broad economic and monetary policy guidelines. We support the idea that national parliaments must be involved upstream and must take ownership of this process, of this strategy, but this must not be to the detriment of the conditions under which the European Parliament’s position is defined. On this matter, as you know, we have a problem with the timing and I am counting on your cooperation and support so that this Parliament can be in a position to adopt its contribution to these broad guidelines under favourable conditions."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph