Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-05-12-Speech-4-134"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-05-12"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050512.14.4-134"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-05-12-Speech-4-1352
lpv:speaker	lp:Ilda Figueiredo2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation to the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Coligação Democrática Unitária (PCP-PEV) (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 vice-chair; EMPL (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3 vice-chair; EUL/NGL (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; AGRI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; FEMM (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Romania Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2006-12-31)3 member; Delegation for relations with Mercosur (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3
lpv:translated text	". The EU’s information and communication strategy must always be objective and respect pluralism, cultural diversity and human rights. The events we have witnessed, particularly recently in the context of the so-called draft constitutional treaty, have been examples of neither objectivity nor pluralism. What we have seen is a major propaganda campaign that does not respect pluralism and the different opinions held by the Members of this House, nor does it take into account the spectrum of opinions held by the public. This report is a clear example of manipulation dressed up as the EU’s information and communication strategy. Take Article 40, for example: ‘have the political responsibility to support the ratification of the Constitution’. This disregards the fact that people have different opinions, even when it is known that in various Member States around half of the public is opposed to this draft constitutional treaty. It also overlooks opposing opinions. Unfortunately, various proposals that would have improved the report were rejected in the vote in plenary. We therefore had no choice but to vote against."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph