Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-05-11-Speech-3-099"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-05-11"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050511.13.3-099"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-05-11-Speech-3-1002
lpv:speaker	lp:Ilda Figueiredo2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation to the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Coligação Democrática Unitária (PCP-PEV) (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 vice-chair; EMPL (2004-07-22--2007-01-14)3 vice-chair; EUL/NGL (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; AGRI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 member; FEMM (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Romania Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2006-12-31)3 member; Delegation for relations with Mercosur (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3
lpv:translated text	". We welcome the fact that Parliament has not adopted a large number of the proposals contained in the Commission’s position on the new directive on working time. This is one of the most dangerous aspects of the attacks on workers’ rights and jeopardises the gains made in a struggle that has lasted over 100 years, affecting millions of workers and their families. We welcome the scrapping of the opt-out, three years after a new directive, to which we contributed, was adopted. We are very disappointed that a classification of inactive time has been accepted, and that the rulings of the Court of Justice are to be disregarded. This gives rise to the possibility of the work place being subject to still further deregulation, leading to even greater difficulty in reconciling working life and family life and in protecting workers’ health and safety. There is also the possibility of working hours being annualised. Hence our vote against."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph