Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-05-10-Speech-2-307"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20050510.26.2-307"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spoken text |
".
Frankly, we are not flexible enough. We have proposed in the future regulation, for example, setting up a kind of special reserve. I cannot remember how big it was supposed to be, but it would be a certain percentage of the funds. Then every Member State would have a reserve for cases like this and there would be no need to shift money between programmes or projects and become involved in a very complicated and bureaucratic process. Unfortunately, in spite of the Rover case, there is no support among the Member States for such a reserve. So we will be deprived of this kind of flexibility in the future.
At the same time, not only through the funds but also in general, we have embarked on a process that would allow us to contribute to the European structure in such a way as to ensure that future structures, based on new factors of production and growth, would be more flexible. This would allow the industries to adjust in time and in an evolutionary manner, rather than leading to the kind of restructuring we are facing in the case of Rover. This is a question of flexible structures, which we can usually achieve if we base industrial development on modern factors, such as research and development, and modern technology. These structures are much more flexible than the old industry."@en1
|
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples