Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-03-09-Speech-3-052"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-03-09"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Mid-term review of the Lisbon strategy (continuation)2
dcterms:Language	"it"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050309.5.3-052"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-03-09-Speech-3-0532
lpv:speaker	lp:Guido Sacconi2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Democratici di Sinistra (2004-07-29--2008-02-18)3,3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of south-east Europe (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3,3 member; ENVI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3,3 substitute; AGRI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3,3 member; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2004-09-15--2006-12-13)3,3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, ladies and gentlemen, if I were asked for the two main reasons why I consider the convergence in the positions of the Council Presidency, the Commission and Parliament that we see today to be important, I would reply that my first reason is that the social and environmental aspects of development are being sincerely acknowledged not as constraints and obstacles but as factors in our competitiveness. My second reason is that we all agree that in order to properly relaunch the Lisbon Strategy it is essential to create a sense of ownership of the strategy that filters down to local levels, so that responsibility lies first and foremost with national governments and parliaments as well as with the public. I agree wholeheartedly on this point, which I hope will be transformed into tangible measures in the European Council. This time, however, I must disagree with what Mrs Frassoni said in her speech. Among her reasons for rejecting the proposal for a resolution – which I, on the other hand, support – she mentioned the fact that one of the paragraphs in the resolution called the REACH regulation into question. Madam President, you know very well how much I value that regulation and I would never risk jeopardising it by supporting the proposal for a resolution. I should, however, like to call on my fellow Members not to regard the regulation as a symbol of good or evil any longer, as polarisation of that kind implies that in the end there will be winners and losers. I believe, instead, that reaching agreement on that regulation would be a victory for us all."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph