Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-03-08-Speech-2-095"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-03-08"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:A new organisational structure for financial services committees2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050308.10.2-095"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-03-08-Speech-2-1012
lpv:speaker	lp:Pervenche Berès2
lpv:spokenAs	member; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Parti socialiste (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 chair; ECON (2004-09-01--2007-01-14)3 member; Conference of Committee Chairs (2004-09-01--2007-01-15)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 substitute; AFCO (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, as we are going to endorse this procedure, I would simply like to draw the House’s attention to the importance of this document. It is an agreement on first reading in an area of codecision. Clearly, this trend is likely to continue and we must ensure that Parliament’s rights are preserved in situations of this kind. In this particular case, we have in a way been a guinea pig. The version of the Commission document on which Parliament voted was not the same as that adopted by the Council, apparently because the lawyer-linguists got involved after Parliament’s vote. Thanks to what was described as a technical intervention, policy directions were obviously taken that were contrary to how Parliament had voted. In the previous Parliament, our colleague Richard Corbett was presented with an own-initiative report to establish the proper way of proceeding on such occasions. I hope that Parliament will be able to adopt a report on this very quickly because we need additional weapons to stand up to the Council and Commission in such cases of agreement on first reading."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph