Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-03-08-Speech-2-067"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2005-03-08"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Social situation in the European Union2
dcterms:Language	"it"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050308.7.2-067"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-03-08-Speech-2-0682
lpv:speaker	lp:Luca Romagnoli2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with Mercosur (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)3 member; NA (2004-07-20--2007-01-14)3 member; TRAN (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)3 substitute; EMPL (2004-07-27--2007-01-14)3 unknown; Movimento Sociale Fiamma tricolore (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, I support Mrs Figueiredo’s report, but feel there is a contradiction to which attention must be drawn. In recital L, after referring to the worrying situation of unemployment within the Union, the claim is made that immigration is needed in order to tackle the direct implications for the current labour market. I fundamentally disagree. What we need, in my view, is more stability and fewer stop-gap measures, more certainty and continuity of employment and less public support for major companies, particularly multinationals, which benefit from incentives and tax breaks from the European Union and its Member States, often repaying this by relocating and committing fraud which adversely affects savers. In point five following Recital M, a reference is very properly made to participatory democracy. In this context, we should be continuing to pursue the goal of direct participation in the life of companies, as already stated in the never-applied article 46 of the Italian Constitution – borrowed, moreover, from the Labour Charter of the Italian Social Republic – which recognises the right of workers to collaborate in the management of companies, in the manner and within the limits established by law. This is an example of a legal expedient which, had it been incorporated in the European Constitution and thereafter implemented, would have enhanced the acceptability of a document which is instead an intrusive instrument for the coercion of the destiny of the European population – or which, at the very least, would have enhanced its social value."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph