Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2004-12-01-Speech-3-076"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20041201.11.3-076"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
". Mr President, Parliament already has a clear idea about what the Commission’s position is regarding the proposal by Mr Prodi’s Commission. Mr Barroso’s Commission is not making a new proposal. What is not clear for Parliament is whether it will adopt a position in the forthcoming financial perspective just on common expenditure, or budgetary income also, that is to say, own resources. Could the country to hold the Presidency predict at this stage whether it will agree to discuss own resources with Parliament? The proposal by Mr Prodi’s Commission calls for the United Kingdom’s special rebate on its membership contributions to be abolished. That is only fair. Does the Council really need to have the support of Parliament to raise this issue? How strong is the Council’s commitment to a 1% maximum? As a representative of the Netherlands, the country to hold the Presidency, could you say for certain whether this 1% refers to commitments or real payments? Finally, many members of our group have taken a negative view of financing the work of the Union through special Eurotaxes, and in this matter we support the position of some Members of the Council."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph