Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2004-11-17-Speech-3-149"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20041117.6.3-149"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
".
We voted against the joint resolution because we disagree with its content and because proposals we tabled were not adopted. Those proposals were in areas as important as the area of freedom, security and justice, and the Hague Programme, to which we are firmly opposed, given that, on the pretext of fighting terrorism and the fight against ‘illegal immigration’, we run an increasing risk of unilaterally prioritising ‘security’ over ‘justice’ and ‘freedom’.
We deplore the fact, for example, that the following proposals tabled by our Group were not adopted:
Rejects the general idea of introducing biometric parameters in EU identity documents, such as visas, residence permits or passports, because of the high risks to data protection and to the protection of privacy, because there is no clear justification based on need, functionality, efficiency and because of the potential knock-on effects of including such identification parameters in identity documents.
Strongly opposes the establishment of a European return fund and the appointment by the Commission of a special representative for a common readmission policy;"@en1
|
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples