Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2004-10-27-Speech-3-123"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20041027.8.3-123"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
"Mr President, the elections and referenda in Belarus were held under acute pressure and intolerable interference, primarily on the part of the United States of America, which put into operation the so-called 'Act of 2004', allegedly for democracy in Belarus. NATO delegates also suddenly discovered a link between Belarus and international terrorism. The European Union followed a similar tack. The statement by the Dutch Presidency and the Commission on the results of the elections are, in our opinion, yet more pressure on and coercion of the government of Belarus. They violate international law and the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of another state. The allegations both on the part of the European Union and on the part of the United States of America about alleged violations of democratic rights are hypocritical. The real reason, as we all know, for such intense intervention is the refusal by Belarus to yield to ΝΑΤΟ and the other imperialist organisations. The reports by the various western observers cannot be reliable, because they serve political expediencies, or should I say they are to order. Moreover, there are other reports, by Russia, China and the Commonwealth of Independent States, which are different. In our opinion, the people of Belarus alone have the authority and responsibility to decide on their future, which is why we denounce and condemn such pressure and interference. No one gives you the right, gentlemen of the Commission, gentlemen of the Council, to teach and export democracy to other countries. The people alone have the authority to resolve their problems. Obviously, of course, both the European Union and the United States of America would express their satisfaction if the elections had been held as in Afghanistan, in Iraq, in Kosovo or in Bosnia, which are under occupation, which have been turned into protectorates and in which, of course, in your opinion ..."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph