Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2004-03-30-Speech-2-085"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2004-03-30"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20040330.4.2-085"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2004-03-30-Speech-2-0862
lpv:speaker	lp:Sérgio Ribeiro2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Members from the European Parliament to the Joint Parliamentary Assembly of the Agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific States and the European Union (ACP-EU) (2004-02-25--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Development and Cooperation (2004-02-25--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (2004-02-16--2004-07-19)3 member; EUL/NGL (2004-02-03--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Partido Comunista Português (2004-02-03--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	". This proposal for a Regulation follows on from a Court of Justice ruling arising from an action brought by the Commission against Member States that had signed bilateral ‘open sky’ agreements, for having infringed the Community’s external competence and the freedom of establishment. The Commission proposed that the Member States should initiate procedures to terminate the agreements that they had concluded and asked the Council for permission to open Community negotiations with all the bilateral partners. As regards matters lying partly within Community competence and partly within the competence of the Member States, the Commission proposed a common approach, in other words, close cooperation. In its Common Position, the Council accepted the positions of the EP. The Member States will thus still have the right to negotiate and conclude bilateral air service agreements, without need for prior authorisation from the Commission, even if the subject matter of these lies partly within Community competence, provided that they include certain types of clause defined jointly by the Commission and by the Member States. This approach will continue to guarantee the Member States freedom of action, and so we voted in favour."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph