Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2004-03-11-Speech-4-130"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2004-03-11"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote (continuation)2
dcterms:Language	"el"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20040311.6.4-130"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2004-03-11-Speech-4-1312
lpv:speaker	lp:Konstantinos Alyssandrakis2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Committee on Culture, Youth, Education, the Media and Sport (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 vice-chair; Delegation to the EU-Cyprus Joint Parliamentary Committee (2002-02-07--2004-04-30)3 member; EUL/NGL (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Kommounistiko Komma Elladas (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Hungary Joint Parliamentary Committee (2002-02-07--2004-04-30)3
lpv:translated text	". Once again Parliament has turned its attention to the progress of the candidate countries. The truth is that this is a question of the annexation of these countries to the ΕU, which is why the MEPs of the Communist Party of Greece will be voting against the report, which has every reason to welcome the ‘progress’ which has allegedly been made by these countries. Their peoples have every cause for concern. The selling off to big business of public corporations and their wealth, the abolition of all socialist achievements and ownership, the restriction on their sovereign rights and so forth are the price which the peoples of the candidate countries are paying and will continue to pay. The report is brimming with hypocrisy as far as human rights are concerned. There is not one single reference to the lack of political rights of the Russian minority in the Baltic states, to the persecutions and prohibitions of communist parties and their leaders and symbols, none of which, in the EU’s eyes, qualifies as an infringement of human rights, as their officials have repeatedly and provocatively stated. For Cyprus in particular, we wonder: what does the reference to the imminent accession of the Greek Cypriots alone mean? Similarly, why, given that everyone recognises that Denktaş is responsible for the lack of progress in negotiations, are they pushing for further concessions from the Greek-Cypriot side? We are certain that the Cypriot people will fight for a fair and viable solution."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph