Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2004-03-11-Speech-4-117"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2004-03-11"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote (continuation)2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20040311.6.4-117"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2004-03-11-Speech-4-1182
lpv:speaker	lp:Ilda Figueiredo2
lpv:spokenAs	member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (2002-03-06--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Partido Comunista Português (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; EMPL (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 substitute; AGRI (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Women's Rights and Equal Opportunities (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries and the Gulf (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Temporary committee on improving safety at sea (2003-11-20--2004-04-21)3 substitute; PECH (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	". How should we view this proposal, when we are faced with the colonialist and aggressive approach of the Israeli government against the Palestinian people? How should we view this proposal, when the Israeli army has carried out further attacks that have killed scores of people, including children? How should we view this proposal when the Israeli authorities continue to build an illegal and unacceptable wall of occupation and apartheid? How should we view this agreement, having heard the testimony of Palestinians who are denied the most fundamental rights, such as peace, security, food, health, education, housing, employment, freedom of movement, the most basic living conditions, dignity, an independent and sovereign State? How should we view this agreement, having heard the testimony of Israelis who are fighting in their own country for peace and against their government’s policy, many of whom have been or are in danger of being imprisoned for refusing to serve in the occupying Israeli army? How should we view this proposal, given the unacceptable position of the EU which, whilst claiming to be ‘impartial’, insists on placing the aggressor and the victim, the colonising force and the victim of colonisation, the Israeli army and the Palestinian people on the same footing? How should we view this proposal, when the Israeli army has destroyed practically all Palestinian infrastructures, many of which were built with EU funding?"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph