Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2004-02-10-Speech-2-271"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2004-02-10"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20040210.10.2-271"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2004-02-10-Speech-2-2722
lpv:speaker	lp:Alonso José Puerta2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Izquierda Unida (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; AFCO (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America and Mexico (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 vice-president; Parliament's Bureau (2002-01-15--2004-07-19)3 member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (1999-10-13--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 vice-president; European Parliament (2002-01-15--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Question No 51 by Michael Gahler (): On 15 December 2003 the Hungarian Parliament passed a government bill that restricts the ability of the Hungarian Financial Supervisory Authority (PSZÁF) to act freely when carrying out its statutory tasks. At the same time, action is being taken to intervene in an ongoing court case that could bring politically inconvenient facts to light. Commissioner Bolkestein has previously made clear in a letter what standards are to be imposed on a financial watchdog. The European Central Bank, like MEPs, has criticised the planned amendments to the law. Does the Commission consider, particularly with the correct use of European funds in mind, that an independent financial regulatory authority is still in place? If so, why? If not, what steps does it intend to take to safeguard the financial interests of the EU?"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"President."1 "Subject: Independence of the Hungarian Financial Supervisory Authority (PSZÁF)"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph