Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2004-02-10-Speech-2-127"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2004-02-10"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote (continuation)2
dcterms:Language	"da"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20040210.5.2-127"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2004-02-10-Speech-2-1282
lpv:speaker	lp:Bent Hindrup Andersen2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; JuniBevægelsen (2003-03-01--2004-07-19)3 member; EDD (2003-03-01--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (2003-03-25--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"The ICES (International Council for the Exploration of the Sea) operates today as an important independent organisation, based on national research institutions. There is therefore no reason for the EU to seek membership and appoint people to work in the ICES. Firstly, it would place a question mark over both the ICES’s and the Commission’s independence, since the Commission is the main user of the ICES’s results. Secondly, there is a limited number of qualified researchers. If the Commission is to appoint researchers to this task, it will lead to a drain on the national institutions, for the simple reason that the Commission pays better. The June Movement’s three Members of the European Parliament, Ulla Sandbæk, Jens-Peter Bonde and Bent Hindrup Andersen, chose to vote against the report, a decision for which the following explanation of vote was given. In principle, the June Movement believes that all attempts by the EU to dominate the ICES should be voted down. This ought to be a national concern. The June Movement believes it would be better if the EU were to call upon the nation states to increase their scientific capacity in relation to the ICES and, if need be, to coordinate research efforts in the area."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph