Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2004-01-13-Speech-2-122"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20040113.5.2-122"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
".
When, in the fifties and sixties of the last century, nuclear fission was promoted as an inexhaustible source of energy for the future, scarcely a thought was given to the waste. The radioactivity of that material takes a long time to diminish and can last for tens of thousands of years at a lower level. This insoluble problem of waste should be a compelling reason to refrain from any further use of nuclear fission. Instead, pressure is mounting to increase underground storage capacity for this hazardous material, for example in the underground salt domes in the Dutch province of Drenthe. In JuneĀ 2003, I asked the European Commission for clarification on the subject of plans to make it compulsory for Member States of the EU to use geological disposal sites for the permanent disposal of the most hazardous forms of radioactive waste from 2018. In reply, I was told that a study on the evaluation of the functioning of geological containment systems had shown that all the European countries have a suitable subsoil of suitable clay, salt or crystalline rock strata. In addition, the possibility now seems to be left open of regarding this waste as a commodity that must be allowed in to all Member States of the EU without an import licence by virtue of the free movement of goods. Since Parliament does not have the authority to prohibit this, the only remaining way of contesting imports is via the Court of Justice of the EC. As far as I am concerned, this is reason enough to vote against this whole directive."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples