Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-12-18-Speech-4-120"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2003-12-18"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20031218.4.4-120"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2003-12-18-Speech-4-1212
lpv:speaker	lp:Alain Esclopé2
lpv:spokenAs	vice-chair; Delegation to the EU-Romania Joint Parliamentary Committee (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 member; Temporary committee on improving safety at sea (2003-11-20--2004-04-21)3 member; EDD (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Culture, Youth, Education, the Media and Sport (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Chasse, Pêche, Nature, Traditions (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	". I voted against the Sommer report because the proposal to put in place a European electronic toll system goes too far. The aim, set out in the White Paper, of combating road traffic congestion, can be achieved through other means. European electronic toll services are not a priority in this field. It would be more judicious, for example, to reduce heavy goods traffic, and to encourage road-rail transport. For Member States to adapt their respective infrastructures to put such a system in place would lead to disproportionate costs borne once again by the road user. Current toll systems work relatively well and there is no urgent need to put such a system in place. In the name of the principle of subsidiarity, the decision to opt for such a system and for the appropriate technology should be left to the discretion of individual Member States."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph