Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-12-04-Speech-4-089"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20031204.6.4-089"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
There are positive aspects to this report, which puts forward interesting approaches to prevent, regulate, control and monitor corruption in various fields, such as political and administrative activity, public contracts, and in international relations, amongst other things.
It can be criticised, however, for:
a degree of federalism, which we do not endorse, examples of which are its defence of the European arrest warrant, the increase in Europol and Eurojust’s powers and even poorly defined, heavy-handed and unjustified creation of a European public prosecutor's office.
some confusion between measures for transparency and measures for standardisation (customs) with less attention being paid to the interests of peoples and nations;
a highly administrative, bureaucratic and federalist outlook, which is not very participative and would exert little political control over the major economic and financial powers, specifically: off-shore investment houses, banking, clearing houses, in other words, genuine money-laundering institutions.
Hence our abstention from the vote."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples