Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-11-06-Speech-4-099"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20031106.6.4-099"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
".
This recommendation should be seen in the context of the debate about the Green Paper on procedural safeguards, in particular of a proposal for a framework decision on common minimum standards governing procedural law, in which the rapporteur highlights various rights that need to be safeguarded and advocates including a non-regression clause for standards already established in each country’s legislation – bringing these into line with the highest levels.
It is regrettable and significant, however, that Parliament has not adopted the proposals for amendment tabled by my group insisting on the ‘entry into force of the framework decision on procedural safeguards being a precondition for the entry into force of the European arrest warrant and for the full implementation of the principle of the mutual recognition of final decisions in criminal matters in the European Union’. As some of my fellow Members have stated, it is hard to understand how, by not making the framework decision on procedural safeguards a precondition for the entry into force of the ‘European arrest warrant’ the rights to a defence will be safeguarded in this context. I would recall that we fully rejected the ‘European arrest warrant’, which is about to enter into force."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples