Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-10-23-Speech-4-103"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2003-10-23"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20031023.2.4-103"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2003-10-23-Speech-4-1042
lpv:speaker	lp:Luís Queiró2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Partido Popular (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; PETI (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of South America and MERCOSUR (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 vice-chair; UEN (2000-09-21--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"As with most reports considering the gamut of views on a given issue – EU foreign policy, in this case – we have found that some of the conclusions reached here deserve our support, while we cannot agree with others. That, of course, is in the nature of compromise texts. We agree with conclusions such as those on transatlantic cooperation, which appear in several paragraphs, or those on the need for clear definitions of priorities and threats, with a view to averting possible crises. As for our disagreements, I would highlight the foreign policy instruments proposed for the Union, including the European Foreign Minister, enhanced cooperation in defence policy and qualified majority voting in common foreign and security policy. I maintain a reserved and cautious stance on these issues, not least because they are under discussion in the Intergovernmental Conference. Since I wish neither to distance myself from the positions with which I agree nor to support those I oppose, abstention was my only option."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph