Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-09-24-Speech-3-152"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2003-09-24"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20030924.2.3-152"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2003-09-24-Speech-3-1532
lpv:speaker	lp:Georges Berthu2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation to the European Economic Area Joint Parliamentary Committee (EEA) (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 substitute; ECON (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; NA (2001-01-31--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Mouvement pour la France (2000-11-23--2004-07-19)3 member; AFCO (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with Canada (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"We voted against the report by Mr Gil-Robles Gil Delgado and Mr Tsatsos, which develops a strategy of ‘encircling’ the Intergovernmental Conference seeking to oblige national government representatives to more or less ratify the conclusions of the Convention. Thus Parliament is showing that it is aware of the importance of the federalist breakthroughs achieved by the Convention, in particular, with the proposal for a European Constitution, which was not part of the initial mandate given by the Council, for whom it is an unexpected result that it does not want to compromise. The Commission is not following the same strategy and is clearly trying to benefit from the IGC in order to make greater progress in terms of supranationality, for example, almost completely abolishing unanimity voting, methods of revision that make it possible to get around the opposition of some nations or stronger economic governance. In any case, this is about moving towards a European super state, which the citizens do not want. We hope that at the IGC the national governments will remember this and will not let their hands be tied by the European Institutions."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph