Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-07-02-Speech-3-081"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20030702.2.3-081"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
".
Public tenders have for a long time been considered a panacea. On the one hand, they are an alternative to nepotism, the awarding of public contracts to entrepreneurs who are friendly with politicians or high officials. On the other, they are intended to bring to an end the production and provision of services by companies that are owned by the government itself, and so to enable private companies to access new markets.
I have already indicated – at first reading on 17 January 2002 – that I agree with the first intention but not with the second, which renders governments increasingly more dependent on companies. The damage can only be limited by means of all kinds of bureaucratic rules which will, however, remain unknown to many and will therefore be broken on a regular basis. In fact, the Dutch employers' organisation VNO-NCW has requested not to make the tender directives more far-reaching by adding 'a multitude of social and environmental criteria'. In its opinion, putting out to tender is 'a purely economic process which should not be contaminated so as to achieve other goals'. Even the rapporteur himself has already deleted a number of points on the subject of social protection and environment. I reject this approach.
I do, however, share the rapporteur's view that the schoolbooks market does not function across borders and is not open to free competition, so that it is thus preferable not to lay down rules that assume that this is the case."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples