Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-05-14-Speech-3-079"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20030514.3.3-079"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
I am voting against this report because I believe that the European Cooperative Society (SCE) exceeds the scope of legislative harmonisation and constitutes a new supranational legal form. I do not agree with the view that the high number of exemptions made for national legislation would not damage the innovative nature of the SCE. In fact, at a strictly interpretative level, I consider the view that a legal framework must be impervious to specific local characteristics in order to warrant the term reductive. I would instead suggest that this factor can only enrich the organisation and enable it truly to adapt to specific cases and situations.
The argument of ‘completing the internal market’, which is presented as a justification for using Article 95 is not clearly delimited, since it applies to almost all legislation. There is a clear political attempt by the rapporteur and the committees delivering an opinion to promote the allocation of more and greater powers to Parliament, and they all allege that this claim is merely based on doctrines accepted in law.
I am genuinely sorry that this approach has been used as a weapon and as a justification for yet another institutional conflict. Prudence dictates that instead of demanding further power, we should make good use of what we have."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples