Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2003-05-13-Speech-2-111"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20030513.5.2-111"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spoken text |
".
Overall, the amendments adopted by the ITRE Committee on 23rd April do not improve on the Commission's text. The amendments have produced an extremely complicated proposal which would be even more harmful to the generally large industrial CHP plants which are the main UK interest, than the Commission's original proposal.
These amendments taken as a whole are based on the assumption that all cogeneration ‘with an efficiency level of at least 80% always leads to substantial energy savings in comparison to the separate generation of energy and heat and may therefore be regarded as efficient.’ It is not true that an efficiency of 80% will guarantee substantial energy savings is disputable. Schemes with the same overall efficiency do not necessarily save the most fuel and displace the most CO2 emissions. It is important to value electrical efficiency more than heat efficiency and the report as tabled does not do this.
Overall, the approach is too academic and takes little account of the practical difficulties of implementing the approach at industrial sites – some of which can be extremely complex. Adoption of the proposal would seriously damage the prospects for cogeneration in the UK."@en1
|
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
"(Abbreviated in accordance with Rule 137(1)of the Rules of Procedure)"1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples